Purchase Decision Maker is a critical concept in the Jobs to be Done (JTBD) framework that identifies the individuals or entities who make the final decision to purchase solutions that help job beneficiaries get their jobs done. Understanding purchase decision makers is essential for portfolio companies to develop effective marketing, sales, and product strategies that accelerate growth and create equity value.
A purchase decision maker is the individual or entity that decides which solution to purchase for job beneficiaries and job executors. They control the financial resources and have the authority to approve or reject spending on solutions that help get jobs done.
In the JTBD framework, purchase decision makers are distinguished from:
This three-role distinction provides a complete picture of the customer ecosystem and is crucial for developing comprehensive growth strategies.
The identity and influence of purchase decision makers vary significantly across different market types:
In consumer markets, the job beneficiary, job executor, and purchase decision maker are frequently the same person. Individual consumers benefit from getting jobs done (like getting to destinations on time, creating moods with music, or sharing memories), execute these jobs themselves, and make their own purchase decisions.
However, there are important exceptions where purchase decisions are made by someone other than the job beneficiary:
In these cases, portfolio companies must address both the needs of the job beneficiary and the concerns of the purchase decision maker to succeed.
In business-to-business (B2B) markets, purchase decision makers are often distinct from both job beneficiaries and job executors:
The B2B purchasing process typically involves multiple stakeholders, with purchase decision makers having final authority based on budgetary control and organizational responsibility.
Medical markets present perhaps the most complex relationship between job beneficiaries, job executors, and purchase decision makers:
This separation creates unique challenges for portfolio companies in medical markets, as they must satisfy the needs of beneficiaries and executors while meeting the requirements (particularly around cost, evidence, and compliance) of purchase decision makers.
A key insight in the JTBD framework is that purchase decision makers have their own job to get done: making optimal purchasing decisions for their organization or household. This "purchase decision job" is distinct from the functional job that the product or service helps the beneficiary accomplish.
The purchase decision job typically includes steps such as:
Understanding this purchase decision job is essential for portfolio companies to effectively engage with purchase decision makers and increase their sales close rates.
Purchase decision makers are influenced by a range of factors that may differ from the concerns of job beneficiaries:
Portfolio companies that address these motivations in their product design, marketing, and sales approaches are more likely to win purchase approval from decision makers.
The purchasing process typically involves multiple stages, with purchase decision makers playing different roles at each stage:
In early stages, purchase decision makers may:
As options are considered, purchase decision makers typically:
In the final stages, purchase decision makers:
Understanding this process helps portfolio companies align their sales and marketing activities with the needs of purchase decision makers at each stage.
Portfolio companies often face several challenges when engaging with purchase decision makers:
Purchase decision makers, especially in larger organizations, may be difficult to identify and access directly. They often rely on recommendations and research from others in the organization, making it challenging for vendors to directly influence their thinking.
Purchase decision makers typically evaluate multiple competing investment opportunities simultaneously. Portfolio companies must demonstrate not just that their solution is valuable, but that it represents a better use of limited resources than alternative investments.
Purchase decision makers often face greater consequences for failed purchases than rewards for successful ones. This can create a bias toward established vendors and conservative solutions, creating challenges for innovative products.
Sometimes purchase decision makers prioritize factors (like cost or standardization) that conflict with what would best serve job beneficiaries. This can create situations where superior solutions from a job execution perspective are rejected for financial or organizational reasons.
To overcome these challenges and effectively engage purchase decision makers, portfolio companies can employ several strategies:
Understanding purchase decision makers should influence not just marketing and sales approaches but also product design:
Portfolio companies should include features specifically designed to address purchase decision makers' concerns:
Products should be accompanied by materials that support purchase decision makers:
Pricing models should align with purchase decision makers' preferences:
thrv's proprietary Jobs to be Done methodology includes specific approaches for analyzing purchase decision makers and incorporating this understanding into portfolio company strategies:
thrv helps portfolio companies analyze the purchase decision job in their specific markets, identifying:
thrv's methodology ensures that portfolio companies develop strategies that address all three key roles:
This multi-audience approach ensures that products create value for beneficiaries while addressing the requirements of purchase decision makers.
thrv helps portfolio companies optimize their go-to-market approaches to effectively engage purchase decision makers:
For portfolio companies, understanding purchase decision makers delivers several strategic benefits:
By proactively addressing purchase decision makers' concerns, companies can reduce friction in the sales process and accelerate deal closure.
Solutions designed with purchase decision makers in mind are more likely to receive final approval, increasing the percentage of opportunities that convert to sales.
When portfolio companies clearly demonstrate value in terms relevant to purchase decision makers, they face less pressure to compete on price alone.
Understanding purchase decision makers' organizational perspectives often reveals opportunities to expand solution scope and increase deal values.
Strong relationships with purchase decision makers contribute to more reliable forecasting and stable revenue streams.
Many competitors focus exclusively on job beneficiaries, creating opportunities for portfolio companies that effectively address purchase decision makers' needs as well.
The influence of purchase decision makers extends beyond initial purchase decisions to affect the entire customer relationship:
Purchase decision makers control the initial buying decision, evaluating options against organizational criteria and determining which solutions to adopt.
As initial implementations demonstrate value, purchase decision makers determine whether to expand usage, add capabilities, or roll out solutions to additional parts of the organization.
Purchase decision makers periodically reassess existing solutions, determining whether to continue investments or explore alternatives.
Satisfied purchase decision makers can become powerful advocates, influencing peers in other organizations and providing references that accelerate sales to new customers.
Portfolio companies that develop strategies addressing purchase decision makers at each stage of this lifecycle create more sustainable growth and greater long-term equity value.
Purchase decision makers play a critical role in the success of portfolio companies, controlling access to resources and determining which solutions organizations adopt. By understanding purchase decision makers as a distinct audience with their own jobs to be done, portfolio companies can develop more effective products, marketing approaches, and sales strategies.
The thrv methodology provides portfolio companies with structured approaches to analyze purchase decision makers, understand their needs, and develop solutions that satisfy job beneficiaries while addressing purchase decision makers' requirements. This comprehensive approach accelerates growth, increases close rates, and ultimately creates greater equity value with reduced risk.